[WT-support] CI-V Interface to Icom is WinTest different than CT?

[g4byg at lindgren1.karoo.co.uk]

I have no problems at all with my 756proIII Oliver and guys. Follows fast
with no delays in updating bandmap freq.
I tested with the latest release of WT downloaded this morning (Thursday
31st).
 PC is 2.8g processor 512m ram 80g h/d
USB controlled CIV interface.
Hope this is of some assistance.
73 de Vic G4BYG
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Olivier F5MZN olecam at f5mzn.org
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:11:18 +0200
To: support at win-test.com, zephd at indy.rr.com
Subject: Re: [WT-support] CI-V Interface to Icom is WinTest different than
CT?


Hi -

Tim Duffy K3LR wrote:
> Oliver ..... I have set the CI-V TRANSCEIVE Option to OFF and it doesn't
> seem to make any difference.
>
> When the Dial is turned suddenly, it takes 1-2 Seconds for the Bandmap
> Frequency to change.
>
> The only way that the Bandmap Frequency changes at a steady, continuous
rate
> is to turn the Dial VERY VERY SLOWLY.
>
> It does not update at the rate we are used to in CT - there's no doubt
about
> that.  We are used to the Bandmap Frequency changing much more rapidly in
> CT.
>
> I don't care if the implantation is the same as CT, but it's VERY
IMPORTANT
> to us that it work as well as CT.
>
> Right now I would classify this as a SHOW STOPPER.

Anybody else noticed the same result with Icom radios?

73,
--
Olivier / f5mzn
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
Support at win-test.com
http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

____________________________________________________________________________
This email and all attachments have been electronically scanned by Kingston
Communications' email Anti-Virus service and no known viruses were detected.
____________________________________________________________________________




--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .