<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16640" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=MailContainerBody
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
bgColor=#ffffff leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bob</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Here's some more suggestions:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>* Single focus screen in WT - its almost impossible
to get lost in another window. If you do loose focus from the main screen, its
easy to get back.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>* N1MM is based on Microsoft Access Database
architecture. It may have improved these days, however traditionally it was
not so reliable for networking; much better as a 'stand-alone'
database.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>* Personally, I find WT less 'cluttered' than
other software, but I guess that's rather a subjective view.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>* As has been previously stated, I think its
robustness in a local network environment has to be one of its strongest selling
points.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>* N1MM has become a 'contest logger for all' to its
own detriment I believe (i.e. too many enhancement requests are
accepted). The WT developers have a strategy that they are generally
sticking to - this may result in some disappointed users, however I believe it
makes the product more robust by minimizing change (for example the requests for
ESM etc being declined).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Just a few thoughts, hope they are of
use..</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>John G4IRN</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>(and Win-Test administrator for the VoodDoo
Contest Group)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2>------------------------------------------</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>If anyone on this list has used Writelog or N1MM, but then settled
on<BR>Win-Test, what do you see as the main advantages of Win-test over
these<BR>other two programs? A feature-by-feature comparison table isn't
that<BR>helpful; please describe the most important differences.<BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>