<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Arial;
color:blue;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>How would everyone compare this program to
N1MM. The configurability of N1MM and the number of contests supported seem to
be its major benefit. Comments from those that have used both in serious
contest operating?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font size=2
face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>
support-bounces@win-test.com [mailto:support-bounces@win-test.com] <b><span
style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>Rick Dougherty NQ4I<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Sunday, December 09, 2007
06:37 PM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> Support@win-test.com<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> [WT-support] KC1XX turns
down win-test</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>I find it amazing that KC1XX has turned down win-test over a few
irrational discrepancies...if the same process were used to evaluate their
current program, CT they would turn it down also...things in CT that curse its
users like 1. no two computes have the same score or number of qso's 2.
networking nightmares 3. Crashing of computers 4. and the list goes on and
on..I moved to Win-Test in May of last year and its one of the single most
advancements in technology made at my station in many years...I applaud the
support that I have .....almost daily feedback ...I appreciate the constant
effort to make a great program truly excellent...and all of my operators have
commented that it has been such a seamless and great improvement in the
station..I only wish I had done it a year earlier...we really love the on-line
scoring too...to Oliver and Larry....Great job!!! <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>To KC1XX your loss and our gain!!!<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>de Rick NQ4I<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>