<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#ff0000 size=2>Hi Laurent</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>> We were networked using a free VPN software
over internet.<BR><BR>For my own information, what software did you use
?<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#ff0000 size=2>Hamachi : </FONT><A
href="https://secure.logmein.com/products/hamachi/vpn.asp"><FONT face=Arial
color=#ff0000
size=2>https://secure.logmein.com/products/hamachi/vpn.asp</FONT></A></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#ff0000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#ff0000 size=2>Fast easy to install and rocky !!! No
issue no difficult, build a own encripted VPN over Internet in a snap
...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>> 1st : in a MM category it could be useful
to setting the color of the QSOs<BR>> in the entry window, setting the
different color with the different<BR>> networked PC. This is useful when you
need to edit YOUR QSO that is shifted,<BR>> far away due the high traffic,
you can find it quickly , ( this means i.e.<BR>> red for 20m, black for 40m
and so on ... )<BR><BR>Actually, I think that having a color per band / mode
would be a <BR>nightmare for the eyes, and also for the dvpler to find 12
different <BR>colors which would fit with a background color ! To be honest, we
are <BR>reserving log colors for other future purposes, and in all cases there
<BR>will be only 2 or 3 of them... Maybe we could think abt using a
<BR>different color for "my QSOs" vs "Other QSOs", but IMHO, using the
<BR>scolling option (Edit menu) "Scroll in my log only" is *much more*
<BR>efficient rather than relying on colors.<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#ff0000 size=2>OK I agree may be a color for it's
own QSO is not a mess</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>> 5th: When the "Warn I am Spotted"is marked
WT check only if the call of the<BR>> spot match the log call
regardless the band, in this way in a HQ stations<BR>> with same call
scatterd over the country and different bands, when show up<BR>> the notify
that you has been spotted you don't know who is because everyone<BR>>
receive with notify, better is to check also the band and notify only if<BR>>
match both ( call AND band ).<BR><BR>IIRC, the frequency is also indicated, but
we can think abt adding an <BR>optional filter with your own band and
mode.<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#ff0000 size=2>Thank's to take care !</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>> 6th: In several windows ( ALT Z, ALT M ,
Check Multiplier, Check Call etc.),<BR>> the option of selecting one or more
bands to view is really annoing when the<BR>> All Band is selected ( and
greyed ) , forcing you to unselect the needed<BR>> band and reselect the
Invert do show the bands needed. Isn't it better that<BR>> the ALL selection
in enabled also when all band are selected and each band<BR>> is unselected
so you can in only one pass selected the needed band selecting<BR>> it from
the unchecked bands ? ( Clear ? no ? I will try to explain better<BR>>
if no clear !! )<BR><BR>I think I got what you mean, but I need to check the
code to keep <BR>compatibility with existing log file (because these options are
saved in <BR>it).<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#ff0000 size=2>OK, I think is only a matter of UI
interface, the saved options are the same, simply showed and managed in
different way .</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>> 7th: Why the Check Callsign window has
dots in the titles and don't show the<BR>> Callsign even checked
?<BR><BR>Because most of the time, the windows is not wide enough to show the
<BR>entire title. Actually, you can hv the entire title in the tooltip which
<BR>is opened when your mouse is over the title bar. Having the callsign
<BR>only in the title is not enough informative, and every wnd needs a
<BR>title. It is called consistency. Furthermore, you know what callsign is
<BR>checked by looking your log.<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#ff0000 size=2>Right , but when I move my eyes to
the Check Callsign windows some time I don't remember the call entered in the
log, so having the call writtn also in the Check Callsign help ... and how you
call the window Check Callsign if the callsign is not viewed ? :)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>> 8th: Question without answer, can each WT
into a WAN network receiving spots<BR>> only from his DXtelnet installed in
the same PC without broadcast the spots<BR>> and the command sended inside WT
? Played with Inbound/Outboud setting in<BR>> both directions but always
there is something wrong ... any default profile<BR>> for this issue
??<BR><BR>You should have used WtTunnelSvr and WtTunnel (client) instead of
<BR>another VPN ;-) These (free !) softwares take care of this, by not
<BR>broascasting the packet frames, and thus allowing every station to use
<BR>the DX-cluster they want. The only way to do this is to drop these
<BR>frames when transmitted outside your LAN. Except if you do a specific
<BR>modification to your VPN software, you can't do it.<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#ff0000 size=2>OK I think that it was a matter of
network configuration, btw we had used a networked WT connected to the Hamachi
Lan only for broadcast the spot over the net. Each WT on the net get it's spots
from this WT. Some traffic on the net but no compliant about performance even
iof WT or Hamachi.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>> 9th: A suggestion getted from competitors
: Can we have a windows with the<BR>> names of the country/zones that are
approaching to the sunset sunrise ?<BR>> Based on the world map, a list of
countries/zones (multiplier or not ) that<BR>> are in the gray line,
useful for 2nd night and low band unmissible juiceble<BR>> multiplier .... (
Better even a suggestion on calls in that country/zone<BR>> that are passed
trough the packet spot flow ..... ) Just dreaming !!<BR><BR>I had the same dream
few months ago (in late November, IIRC). I wrote <BR>down some notes on this. I
will dig my desk shortly ;-)<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Still we will dream both until you get the notes in
your hands !!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>73<BR><BR>Larry - F6FVY<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#ff0000 size=2>73 de I4UFH</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2>_______________________________________________<BR>Support mailing
list<BR></FONT><A href="mailto:Support@win-test.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>Support@win-test.com</FONT></A><BR><A
href="http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>http://www.f5mzn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support</FONT></A><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>